As space agencies around the world race to the red planet
and beyond in an attempt to satisfy ego and ignorance, they may want to focus
their limited resources on real tactical problems facing the planet. As those,
who had a tough time with science at school, rise to make polices that
affect humanity, the danger of human extinction is now more real than ever. To
top it off, those who were good at science appear to get real excitement by
looking at pictures of the dwarf planet and designing ways to punch a one-way
ticket for humans to a planet close-by. Admirable, of course, but completely irrelevant.
It is time NASA had a real resource and portfolio management
process. Engineers, albeit being good at what they do, often fail to see the
big picture. The risk of an asteroid impact or run-away greenhouse effect are
so high in close quarters - it does not make any sense to allocate resources to
finding green men in the solar system or among the thousands of exo-planets,
that were found recently. Terraforming
the Earth, although not as exciting as the projects undertaken by the space
agency, has real utility for humanity. Humans, designed to burn anything they
get their hands to, have cooked up a real mess, that would require rectifying.
It is a solvable problem if the best technologists in the world put their minds
to it and perhaps forget the exploration of the universe for a little bit. Sure,
this may not propel careers or pave the way to easy Nobel prizes, but limited
resources have to be optimally deployed for the sake of humanity. Additionally,
although not as exciting as science fiction including a black hole from the LHC devouring
us all, an asteroid impact that could substantially extinguish humans is real.
Having “plans on paper” to “bomb the rock” may not be realistic. It may require
real technology to nudge the Earth bound catastrophe to safety.
Those who are responsible and accountable for deploying the
limited resources to practical uses may need to refocus their priorities. Ego
cannot be part of the objective function, rationality has to be.